\relax 
\providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
\providecommand*\HyPL@Entry[1]{}
\HyPL@Entry{0<</S/D>>}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{3}{section.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:introduction}{{1}{3}{Introduction}{section.1}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Project Overview}{3}{section.2}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:overview}{{2}{3}{Project Overview}{section.2}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Repository structure highlighting code, experiments, and documentation.}}{3}{figure.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:layout}{{1}{3}{Repository structure highlighting code, experiments, and documentation}{figure.1}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Module-level locELM architecture showing how core components feed the solvers, utilities, and example scripts.}}{4}{figure.2}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:locelm-structure}{{2}{4}{Module-level locELM architecture showing how core components feed the solvers, utilities, and example scripts}{figure.2}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Implementation Summary}{4}{section.3}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:implementation}{{3}{4}{Implementation Summary}{section.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Domain Decomposition}{4}{subsection.3.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Neural Network Architecture}{4}{subsection.3.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Continuity Enforcement}{4}{subsection.3.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Solver Stack}{5}{subsection.3.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5}Utilities and Examples}{5}{subsection.3.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Experimental Evaluation}{5}{section.4}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:experiments}{{4}{5}{Experimental Evaluation}{section.4}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}One-Dimensional Helmholtz Equation}{5}{subsection.4.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Effect of subdomain count ($Q=50$, $M=50$, $R_m=3.0$).}}{5}{table.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:subdomains}{{1}{5}{Effect of subdomain count ($Q=50$, $M=50$, $R_m=3.0$)}{table.1}{}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Effect of training parameters ($N_e=2$, $Q=100$, $R_m=3.0$).}}{6}{table.2}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:training}{{2}{6}{Effect of training parameters ($N_e=2$, $Q=100$, $R_m=3.0$)}{table.2}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Computed versus exact 1D Helmholtz solution with absolute error overlay for the $N_e=4$, $Q=100$, $M=100$ configuration.}}{6}{figure.3}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:helmholtz1d}{{3}{6}{Computed versus exact 1D Helmholtz solution with absolute error overlay for the $N_e=4$, $Q=100$, $M=100$ configuration}{figure.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Two-Dimensional Helmholtz Equation}{6}{subsection.4.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Summary of two-dimensional Helmholtz experiment.}}{6}{table.3}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:helmholtz2d}{{3}{6}{Summary of two-dimensional Helmholtz experiment}{table.3}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Illustrative 2D Helmholtz visualisation from earlier runs: surface plot of the predicted solution and absolute error heatmap. Current vectorised implementation work aims to regenerate this figure without timeouts.}}{7}{figure.4}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:helmholtz2d}{{4}{7}{Illustrative 2D Helmholtz visualisation from earlier runs: surface plot of the predicted solution and absolute error heatmap. Current vectorised implementation work aims to regenerate this figure without timeouts}{figure.4}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Advection Equation Benchmarks}{7}{subsection.4.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Baseline advection simulation ($t_f=10$, $N_e=8$, $Q=20\times 20$, $M=300$). The numerical wave propagates but exhibits order-one absolute error throughout the domain.}}{7}{figure.5}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:advection-baseline}{{5}{7}{Baseline advection simulation ($t_f=10$, $N_e=8$, $Q=20\times 20$, $M=300$). The numerical wave propagates but exhibits order-one absolute error throughout the domain}{figure.5}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Diffusion and Nonlinear Helmholtz Studies}{7}{subsection.4.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Effect of increasing spatial-temporal subdomains on advection accuracy (Section~\ref {sec:review}). Error curves remain flat at $\mathcal  {O}(1)$ across all tested decompositions.}}{8}{figure.6}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:advection-subdomains}{{6}{8}{Effect of increasing spatial-temporal subdomains on advection accuracy (Section~\ref {sec:review}). Error curves remain flat at $\mathcal {O}(1)$ across all tested decompositions}{figure.6}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.5}Burgers Equation Experiments}{8}{subsection.4.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Analysis and Implementation Review}{8}{section.5}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:review}{{5}{8}{Analysis and Implementation Review}{section.5}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Collocation sweep demonstrating that denser sampling does not mitigate the large residual bias in the advection solver.}}{9}{figure.7}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:advection-colloc}{{7}{9}{Collocation sweep demonstrating that denser sampling does not mitigate the large residual bias in the advection solver}{figure.7}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Interpretation of Experimental Results}{9}{subsection.5.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Implementation Assessment}{9}{subsection.5.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Training-parameter study for the advection equation. Even with $M=300$ hidden units per subdomain, the maximum error stalls near $2.0$.}}{10}{figure.8}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:advection-M}{{8}{10}{Training-parameter study for the advection equation. Even with $M=300$ hidden units per subdomain, the maximum error stalls near $2.0$}{figure.8}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Targeted Improvement Opportunities}{10}{subsection.5.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Simplified advection run highlighting the persistent bias at lower resolution.}}{11}{figure.9}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:advection-basic}{{9}{11}{Simplified advection run highlighting the persistent bias at lower resolution}{figure.9}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Outstanding Issues}{11}{section.6}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:issues}{{6}{11}{Outstanding Issues}{section.6}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.1}Accuracy Discrepancy in 1D}{11}{subsection.6.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.2}Performance Bottleneck in 2D}{12}{subsection.6.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Recommendations}{12}{section.7}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:recommendations}{{7}{12}{Recommendations}{section.7}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.1}Critical Fixes}{12}{subsection.7.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.2}Validation Enhancements}{12}{subsection.7.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.3}Extensions and Optimisations}{12}{subsection.7.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {8}Conclusion}{12}{section.8}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:conclusion}{{8}{12}{Conclusion}{section.8}{}}
\gdef \@abspage@last{13}
